Author Topic: Spud Gun  (Read 4996 times)

Offline doubleboost

  • Madmodder Committee
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1621
  • Country: gb
  • Newcastle Upon Tyne
Spud Gun
« on: May 17, 2008, 06:42:40 PM »
Hi
Just a few pictures of a stainless spug gun i built a few years ago the propelant was hairspray the results devistating






Regards
John

Offline Brass_Machine

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5202
  • Country: us
Re: Spud Gun
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2008, 07:25:41 PM »
Holy crap John! I built a much milder version a few years ago for my nephew. Made with PVC and an electric start (from grill). I believe we used Axe deodorant spray for the propellant.

Very cool

Eric
Science is fun.

We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.

Offline raynerd

  • Madmodder Committee
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2850
  • Country: gb
    • Raynerds Projects - Raynerd.co.uk
Re: Spud Gun
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2009, 03:44:55 AM »
That looks fantastic. I teach chemistry and one of the physics teachers built a pressurised spud gun, similar scale to the one shown in the picture. You compressed air in a chamber which had a stop valve to the barrel. Jammed a potatoe in the barrel and then released the valve. To use it in school (they used it to look at projectiles or something at A level!) we had to have it police checked and they found that it was way over the legal limits and was classed as a firearm.

I really want to say this next bit but I`m sure I could be wrong: He then went to shorten the barrel a little bit and for some reason this increased the power upto a critical point - would this be correct?

Chris
Youtube: craynerd
Projects at - www.raynerd.co.uk

Offline Bernd

  • Madmodder Committee
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3684
  • Country: us
  • 1915 C Cab
    • Kingstone Model Works
Re: Spud Gun
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2009, 09:01:25 AM »
Chris,

I've played around with this stuff. Although I haven't read or seen any specks it does kind of make sense.

If you think about it you are using air to propell the potatoe as the air expands it loses it's potenial. Were as with gun powder the hot gases expand. So shorting the barrel would seem to make sense since you are freeing the potatoe of friction sooner. If you extended the pipe or made it longer the friction would eventually stop the potatoe.

Does that make any sense to you. It just seems logical.

Bernd
You can't fix "STUPID".