MadModder

Hi Sorveltaja, sounds like there are linux kernel problems. I wonder if the flatpaks might have had a hand in  that. Generally it is thought on the boards I am on that flatpaks are problematic, while appimages are much preferred. Explanation to others unfamiliar with the terms.... these are a relatively recent form of "generic" application packages. Each uses a different method but they basically have all needed dependencies built in, and are supposedly OS agnostic. They are supposed to be able to be installed and work in any Linux.

As I said though, it seems flatpaks are not viewed favorably, at least in the Puppy Linux/EasyOS world. Appimages seem to work very well.

Hi vtsteam,
I used a 0.5 hp three phase motor running via a vectorless inverter. For screwcutting it works best using the largest back gear pulley which gives a 9 to one redution ratio from the motor spindle. This then results on a stable drive to the spindle with adequate torque so that the cutting force does not slow the spindle down. The light sensor senses one piece of 10mm wide black tape on the inside face of the large pulley, so this gives only one pulse per rev. I tried many variations but this worked best and was most stable. I think the utube video I show was made using the mid sized pulley drive, with the inverter wound down to about 10%. So the video shows slight variations in speed due to this. I should really make another video with the back gear pulley driving the spindle, perhaps when my workshop warms up.
Alan

This time I remembered to export the new CNC assembly as a JPG file.

The magenta colored bits are the parts that will be 3D printed.  I added all the spacers to the 3D model that will be used to bolt the main frame to the base, and the spacers that will turn the two Y extrusions into a sort of truss.  Coincidently, all those spacers also got printed today, and the center-points for the holes in the base got laid out.  I've got to get the holes drilled in the X and Y rails so I can verify that the locations are correct before I drill the base.

That's terrible, sorveltaja! 

I've never had that happen or anything like it.

I would like to help, but I don't know the details of your installed system. I do suspect it is possible to fix it, but I'd need a lot more information to work with.

If I remember correctly you are running Mint in a virtual machine in a Windows system?

Okay, just as a start at recovery, would you be adverse in creating an EasyOS thumbdrive, and then booting from that so we can look at what's happening on your HD? I'm really most familiar with EasyOS and its tools for that.

To create an EasyOS thumbdrive, if you are able to get the following files into Mint (or any other Linux):

easydd makes bootable thumbdrives and installs an OS image to it:

https://bkhome.org/files/easydd.gz

And the latest version of EasyOS (7.2):

https://distro.ibiblio.org/easyos/amd64/releases/excalibur/2026/7.2/

Usage:

Just insert a USB thumbdrive of 4 or more Gb and start easydd. It will ask you for the location of the image file (the EasyOS 7.2 version you downloaded), and the thumbdrive name. The rest is automatic.

When done, you can re-boot with the USB thumbdrive inserted, and if your computer BIOS is set to be able to legacy boot from USB (before the HD) EasyOS will start up. Answer the first boot questions about country and keyboard, etc. and you'll be good to go.

Let me know if you do any of this, and we can go further.....

ps.

If you can't use Mint (or other Linux OS) to download or run the above files, but you can still run Windows, you can use a program called USB-Image-Tool to write the EasyOS image to a USB thumbdrive. (It is not recommended that you use any other Win USB image writers ...like "Etcher").

USB-Image-Tool is available here:

https://www.alexpage.de/usb-image-tool/download/

Got a little more accomplished yesterday, I've added the base and the main frame to the CNC assembly and determined the "safe" locations in the X & Y 2040 extrusions, places where I can poke the holes that will let me start bolting this thing down. The holes through the X 2040 extrusions will let me bolt the main frame down to the base. The holes through the Y 2040 extrusions will let me bolt the 2 Y extrusions together into a sort of truss. That should really help to stiffen up the gantry. I determined that 50mm from the ends of all the 2040 extrusions was a safe location, far enough away from the end that it wouldn't affect any of the threaded holes in the end of the extrusions. (I just keep forgetting to export the main assembly as a JPEG file before I to post - on different computers dontchaknow.)

That let me determine the locations of the 6 through holes, and the 4 counter-bores that are 10mm deep in the base. I initially was going to tap the holes in the base, I've talked myself out of that. I'm going to give myself a little wiggle room, I plan on using four 1/4"-20 bolts in 5/16" holes to bolt the main frame to the base. The bottom spacers that will support the X 2040 extrusions will be 6mm thick. This will give me 1mm of clearance between the "feet" of the endplates and the base - to try and eliminate any twist that could be caused by the high spot I know exists in the base. I designed 3mm thick spacers for the tops of the extrusions to give the bolt heads and washers a flat spot to live. Totaling up the extrusion, spacers, washers, base thickness, and then subtracting the 10mm counter-bore depth I'll need about 71mm, a 1/4-20x3" bolt should work.

For the 16.5mm spacers that I'll need to bolt between the Y 2040 extrusions, I'll probably use something similar to the bottom spacers for the X 2040's. it'll just have an alignment tab on the top and bottom. That could make printing this part interesting, we'll see how the P1S handles it. I may try print this on an angle for strength, like Clough42 suggested in one of his videos. So far with what little I've printed the results have been outstanding. And I am far from being comfortable with either the printer or Orca - just because they're still so new to me.

I also used Alibre to print a 2D drawing of the base, so I'd be able to lay out the holes that need to be drilled in the base. It took me a while to figure out where, and how, to dimension the model so that I'd get a usable 2D drawing. It took me almost as long to find where to change the drawing units from inches to mm. I plan on laying out the hole locations on masking tape first, as a sanity check, before committing to actually drilling the holes. I also plan to test the counter-bore depth on some scrap to see if I'll need to go deeper than 10mm to be able to use a 3" long bolt. A max of 4mm of threads might get a little dicey, bolt threads might not get to the nylon lock. I've still got 20mm of thickness left in the base after the counter-bore, so I can always go a little deeper.