Author Topic: filing machine  (Read 30560 times)

Offline madjackghengis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
  • big engine
filing machine
« on: January 23, 2011, 11:30:00 AM »
Hi all, there was some interest in the die filer I showed in use, and so I took some pictures to display it better.  The die filer is a kit build from Metal Lathe Accessories, which is still listed on the internet with a good many quality bits of tooling.  I bought a cross slide casting so I could mill on my lathe, before I got a mill, then a dial indicator holder, a quick retract threading tool post, and about a half a dozen other bits and pieces, all of which are top quality iron castings, among the best I've ever machined, no blow holes or pockets, and very fine grain structure, and very well designed, written up instructions for what ever level of machining you've reached, and useful, with easy access to help if needed.
   The die filer was a present to myself, and it does a great job of profiling parts putting angles on edges evenly, and since it cuts rather fast, with very little pressure, files last a long time.  It takes files designed to cut on the pull stroke, however if such are difficult to find, one can easily grind a regular file down to fit in the spindle end, and they work fine too.



The basic machine, about thirty pounds, mostly cast iron with the main casting well made with plenty of room inside for the operating parts



The pulley side, a nice heavy cast iron pulley does a good job as a flywheel 1/4 hp motor is more than enough



side view of the machine, showing relative locations of the main shaft, pulley and main housing



a look under the table, never been cleaned off since it first filed, no scoring on the file shaft



another view of the machine



with the table off, you can see the "top hat" which sheds most of the filings away from the shaft, turned out of stainless scrap it holds the allen screw which holds the files in place



under the top hat, lots of filings built up, no problems



filings brushed away showing the bronze cap with a felt washer underneath, keeping out stray filings, works very well at keeping the shaft clean



with the table tilted you see the end cover where all the working parts are accessed



another end view.  Inside, the crankshaft is .750 with a cut away wheel with a .250 pin at .500 radius from the center.  Facing it, a block of cast iron, with a half in reamed hole vertical, for the main filing shaft, which runs in a bronze bushing above the block and into a bushing below as well, in a blind hole.  A half in wide, quarter in deep slot runs sideways across the face of the iron block with a bronze block half by quarter by one in long with a .250 reamed hole in the middle for the crank pin to fit, so it moves the filing shank up and down, while sliding the bronze block back and forth in its slot.  the filing shank has a hole drilled in it from the bottom, with a cross hole intersecting it right about where the crank meets the iron block, the blind bushing hole is open to the oil, which is pressure fed up by the downward movement of the filing shank, and oil squirts out the cross hole, aimed at the crankpin, and oiling the scotch yoke with fresh oil every stroke.
     The main shaft runs in bronze bushings pressed in the bored body of the machine, and reamed in place, with a shaft seal to keep the oil from leaking out onto the pulley.  The table is about eight inches in dia, about half in thick cross section, with a sturdy edge about an inch wide and half an inch deep.  The table supports are half in by in bar stock with three eighths in bolts allowing tilting and adjusting the table for optimal file position.
     I've used it well for more than ten years, never got to cleaning it up after testing it, so it didn't get paint, and it got its first bit of cleaning as I brushed away the filings to show the cover plate for the felt washer.  The main shaft is a piece of scrap shafting, the file shank is a distributor shaft from a Chevy engine, with all the hard to find parts coming with the kit.  It's most useful work is filing and profiling in pierced work, where only a die grinder could get in, but it has better control, while removing less meat per minute, and giving a better finish, and easier to straighten out a crooked line.  It does a great job cleaning up the spokes of a flywheel, or filing off the casting lines on a cast section, as well as doing quick work with sheet metal piercings, working very well with very fine files for removing cutting marks left behind.  It goes for about eighty or ninety dollars plus shipping, but I feel it is well worth the money.  I'd have opened it up and shown the workings, but then I'd have to wash it all out, take it all apart, and replace the main shaft seal.  It could hardly be simpler, yet is very effective for what it does best, one of my better deals in tooling, worth every penny.  Cheerio, mad jack

Offline Powder Keg

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 932
  • Country: us
  • Machinist Extraordinaire
Re: filing machine
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2011, 12:02:33 PM »
Man! I have just about talked myself out of getting a die filer and you come along....
Wesley P
A Gismo ??? If it has a flywheel or spins and is made with small parts. I'll take one! If it makes noise, moves, or requires frequent oiling and dusting it's a better deal yet. It's especially right if its shiny and bright; but if it's dirty and dull it wont mater at all...

Offline raynerd

  • Madmodder Committee
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2893
  • Country: gb
    • Raynerds Projects - Raynerd.co.uk
Re: filing machine
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2011, 01:48:02 PM »
Madjack - nice post. I`m sure it is John who has one of these as well and I have always fancied one since seeing his. It is a pitty Metal Lathe Accessories is in the US, postage I guess would be restrictive. I think hemingway over here in the UK do one but I think it is a lathe add on rather than a self motorised machine. Nice post.

Chris

Offline Gerhard Olivier

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
Re: filing machine
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2011, 01:55:54 PM »
Mad jack

Thanks for posting that looks like a very satisfieing project 

Gerhard
Guernsey
Channel Islands

Offline Sorekiwi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: filing machine
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2011, 02:29:40 PM »
Thats a very nice machine!

I've looked at their kits before and they have some useful castings there.  The one I'm really tempted to buy the drawings of is the "Boring and Facing Head" that they do.  Its too large for my mill or lathe, but I'm thinking (hoping??) it might be able to be scaled down a bit.

Thanks for posting those pics!
Mike, expat Kiwi in NE Ohio, USA

Offline mhh

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 74
  • Country: dk
Re: filing machine
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2011, 02:52:46 PM »
Really nice an very practical machine, I've been considering making one of my own but... where is the time! hehe
Where do you get the files from?

Offline Bogstandard

  • Bogs Group
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: filing machine
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2011, 05:09:53 PM »
Actually, the files are now very rarely available, as far as I know, there are only two manufacturers in the world still making them. You can shape up normal files, because a die file cuts on the downstroke, so you have to modify them opposite to the tang end, so the machine can hold them, but the major problem, most have a tapered shape rather than the required parallel. Round are usually no problem as you can get chainsaw files that are parallel, unfortunately in a limited size range.

This post of mine might help if anyone still wants to obtain some of these rare and obscure items.

http://www.homemodelenginemachinist.com/index.php?topic=10644.0


Bogs
« Last Edit: January 23, 2011, 05:11:41 PM by bogstandard »
If you don't try it, you will never know if you can do it.

Location - Crewe, Cheshire

Skype - bandit175

Offline Pete.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Country: gb
Re: filing machine
« Reply #7 on: January 24, 2011, 07:36:48 AM »
I have a die filer which works on the up-stroke and uses normal files. It has a leaky seal on the bottom of the ram which I need to get around to fixing because it leaks oil slowly each time I fill it. It also likes to hop around a but so needs fitting to a sturdy pedestal.

Offline madjackghengis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
  • big engine
Re: filing machine
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2011, 11:54:15 AM »
Hi John, Pete, Gerhard and all, I wanted a die filer ever since I first used one, realising nothing does what it does as well.  I bought a kit because the cost was reasonable, and well made.  I looked at several versions which were designed to run in a lathe, but I definitely don't want filings anywhere on my lathe bed, so they were never even a possibility.  Pete, I'm not certain, but I suspect your filer is supposed to file on the pull stroke, and would do much less jumping.  The key would be putting the files in upside down, and for any die filer, regular files can be ground on the not tang end, to fit in the filer, and cut off the tang, and then they file on the down stroke.
     I think if I wanted a die filer and couldn't afford one, I'd take a look at a larger two stroke engine, one with a removable cylinder, use the crank, make a spigot bottomed bushing holder for the file holder to fit the cylinder studs, outfit it with a bushing on the bottom end as well, and fabricate a scotch yoke mechanism to drive the filing shaft.  If there is interest in something like that, I would be happy to take a look at my scrap heap, find some parts that look like they ought to be a filer, and see about building one with a build log, and essentially duplicate what is a very effective and good working machine mine is.  I've got a friend or two I could build one for as a present, so I wouldn't end up with an extry one, and that would probably be better than just tossing out an idea, given I know what's inside mine, but don't want to clean everything up so I can open it to show.  Mine has only the seal on the crank shaft, the felt under the bronze cap on the file shaft, and the cover gasket to leak, I think I'd work on making it impossible to leak on the ram, if that's possible, I hate having to stop work on projects to fix machines I'm using on the projects.  I inherited a handful of die files before I had the filer, because the guy who gave them to me said they were made backwards, so I have files of many sorts, but mostly use either rectangular files or round files, except when there is a tight corner which requires a triangular file.  Not to take away anything from John, but most of my work is done with round files and pillar files will modify fairly easily to provide non-tapered squaring files.  The files do last four or five times as long as a hand file generally so obtaining them is less of an issue than it first appeared for me.  I've put a file in to file on the upstroke, and was not at all impressed with the way it worked for me.  I was trying to get somewhere I couldn't get with the work on the table, and the file did more pushing up than filing.  I hope this helped out some, and the offer stands good.  Thanks for all the notice and commentary, I can't say enough good things about my experience with die filers.  :headbang: mad jack

Rob.Wilson

  • Guest
Re: filing machine
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2011, 12:50:06 PM »
Hi Jack

Cracking bit of kit ,, looks very robust  :D


A die filer is on my wish list ,,,,,,,,,, no luck so far  :(  ,,,,,,,,,,,,, looks like i will have to make one some day  :dremel:


Rob

Offline Pete.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Country: gb
Re: filing machine
« Reply #10 on: January 24, 2011, 01:48:39 PM »
Pete, I'm not certain, but I suspect your filer is supposed to file on the pull stroke, and would do much less jumping.  The key would be putting the files in upside down, and for any die filer, regular files can be ground on the not tang end, to fit in the filer, and cut off the tang, and then they file on the down stroke.

Mine jumps about when switched on whether it has a file or not - it's just poorly balanced!

There is an adjustable stay that holds down the work to stop it lifting, but I see no reason why it would not work in either push or pull. I'll take some pics of it, I only ever found one reference online and it was pretty obscure at that.

Offline Bogstandard

  • Bogs Group
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: filing machine
« Reply #11 on: January 24, 2011, 03:29:59 PM »
Tell you what Pete, if the one I have jumped about, it would destroy my shop. It weighs well over 1 cwt.

http://madmodder.net/index.php?topic=864.0

Just a bit more on the files. The reason I went for the 'real things' is because the small ones are made to get right into every tiny corner, just like swiss files can do, but they are much more robust. To modify normal files to do the same thing would not only cost me more, but take up my precious machining time. I also bought some of the very large ones, because my machine can take them as they are, and it was one of those, a half round one, that I used in the opening post of the flame licker I am building. It just swept away the flash off the flywheel as though it wasn't there, in fact I had to be careful I didn't take too much off.

http://www.victornet.com/subdepartments/Parallel-Machine-Files/2215.html?id=TzmenX8s


John
If you don't try it, you will never know if you can do it.

Location - Crewe, Cheshire

Skype - bandit175

Offline Pete.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Country: gb
Re: filing machine
« Reply #12 on: January 24, 2011, 04:54:10 PM »
Mine weighs at least half a cwt, but now you've got me onto the idea I'm going to head off to the workpit and drag the bits out I've stripped it down into and set to work re-conditioning it. I doubt I'll use it much but I bet it comes in handy when I need it. I'll put up a couple of pics sometime.

Offline Pete.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Country: gb
Re: filing machine
« Reply #13 on: January 24, 2011, 06:48:21 PM »
This is what I have. Apart from the leak it all works. Only identification is the plate which might be only the distributor. I haven't found much at all about it online.

Offline madjackghengis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
  • big engine
Re: filing machine
« Reply #14 on: January 24, 2011, 10:06:34 PM »
Hi Pete, that's a good looking filing machine you've got there.  I'd say it's definitely worth cleaning up and stopping the leak, and I seem to remember making sure the counter weight in mine was good and heavy, because the casting for the slide block is pretty heavy.  I got it pretty well balanced without putting a lot of effort into it, but what ever mechanism is used inside to covert rotary to oscillating motion must be offset with counter weight or its bound to dance about.  I've had a couple of machines the builders didn't think much about balancing. :headbang: mad jack

Offline Pete.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Country: gb
Re: filing machine
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2011, 11:21:47 PM »
The guys on Practicalmachinist have identified it as a Harvey Buterfly, and I even found some literature on it there too.

Offline Bogstandard

  • Bogs Group
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: filing machine
« Reply #16 on: January 25, 2011, 02:22:31 AM »
Pete,

Except for a few minor details, I would say that yours is the same as my one, or at least they used the same major castings.

I made the mistake of putting it onto a kitchen cabinet base (as in the shots in the link above), and it did vibrate some, but now it is sitting on a very rigid metal bench, it is as smooth as silk, without bolting down, in fact there are no bolt down areas on it, it is designed to be self standing.

A die filer is one of those machines that you never thought you would ever use until you have actually used one. Then you realise just how useful they really are if you have the correct file shapes, it is also especially noticeable as you get more old and knackered, when filing of big bits becomes a physical no-no.


Bogs
If you don't try it, you will never know if you can do it.

Location - Crewe, Cheshire

Skype - bandit175

Offline trevoratxtal

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Country: england
  • Torbay, South Devon, England
Re: filing machine
« Reply #17 on: January 25, 2011, 03:18:48 AM »
Hello Pete
Ref your machine with William Urquhart label.
I have a milling machine with copy of the same label.
I have tried hard to get more information on the firm of tool merchants, but so far no luck.
If I find any think I will let you know.
Trevor B
« Last Edit: January 25, 2011, 03:24:29 AM by trevoratxtal »

MrFluffy

  • Guest
Re: filing machine
« Reply #18 on: January 25, 2011, 03:24:51 AM »
Every time I see these pictures of a die filer, I always think how useful one would be to me, but have never come across one to follow me home yet whatever the condition. Pete I think that one will serve you well once youve given it the usual fettling treatment and its very nice.

I wonder if a ghetto but workable one could be fabricated from a small (ride on lawnmower sized) vertical ic engine, or even a compressor, with the piston assembly replaced by a more suitable file holding assembly. And a table on top to form the work area.
There is a question mark over the suitability of the diecast alloy crankcase, although it is designed to take a large downward force from the combustion explosion, and they are already fitted with flywheels. I will get around to testing my theory one day soon but is there any obvious reason why not?
Also how do the real units ensure they cut on the downward stroke? is it the orientation of the teeth on the file itself, or does it have some sort of rocking motion to move away from the workpiece on the backstroke?

Offline Bogstandard

  • Bogs Group
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: filing machine
« Reply #19 on: January 25, 2011, 04:39:09 AM »
It is the teeth on the file itself. They go the opposite way to a normal file.
If you don't try it, you will never know if you can do it.

Location - Crewe, Cheshire

Skype - bandit175

Offline Pete.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Country: gb
Re: filing machine
« Reply #20 on: January 25, 2011, 07:31:32 AM »
Hello Pete
Ref your machine with William Urquhart label.
I have a milling machine with copy of the same label.
I have tried hard to get more information on the firm of tool merchants, but so far no luck.
If I find any think I will let you know.
Trevor B

You had the same result as me then. Were you trying to identify the machine itself or just find out about the dealer?

Offline Pete.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Country: gb
Re: filing machine
« Reply #21 on: January 25, 2011, 07:57:38 AM »
I made a pdf from the scans I found on PM.

Harvey Butterfly instructions and parts list[/QUOTE]


Mine actually does have the single hole for bolting it down to a bench Bogs. I guess I better start looking out for some proper files for it :)

Offline Bogstandard

  • Bogs Group
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: filing machine
« Reply #22 on: January 25, 2011, 01:33:14 PM »
Pete,

I spent weeks searching for new die files, and it wasn't until someone gave me a lead that I followed up on that I got to the ones I have already shown.

If you want new ones, those are very reasonably priced.

Bogs
If you don't try it, you will never know if you can do it.

Location - Crewe, Cheshire

Skype - bandit175

Offline Pete.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1075
  • Country: gb
Re: filing machine
« Reply #23 on: January 25, 2011, 02:37:04 PM »
Thanks John!

I just realised I've completely hi-jacked madjackhengis's thread - I'm really sorry about that Jack :(

Offline krv3000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2183
  • Country: gb
Re: filing machine
« Reply #24 on: January 26, 2011, 06:09:41 AM »
a brill post  :D

Offline GWRdriver

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 19
Re: filing machine
« Reply #25 on: January 26, 2011, 11:03:48 AM »
This is what I have.  Apart from the leak it all works.  Only identification is the plate which might be only the distributor. I haven't found much at all about it online.
Pete,
I think you are right about Urqhart being a distributor.  A Scot Urqhart traded out of London for years, selling very nice tooling, rotary tables and such.  I wonder if Scot is the successor?  In any case I have a die filer very similar to yours and it too tends to walk around the tabletop when running.

FYI, here are the names of all known US makers of die filers:
Aaron
Adrian (Adrian-Oliver)
All-American
Bambrick
Bentley
Boice-Crane
Butterfly (Harvey Mfg Co.)
Do-All
Engis
Grob
Harvey Mfg Co. (Butterfly)
High Speed Hammer
Hirschman
Hudson Automatic
Hypres
Illinois Tool
Ideal
Keller
Milwaukee
Nord
Oliver (or Adrian-OLiver)
Pratt & Whitney
Postel
Rice
Setco
Stow
Symmetrical
Tannewita
Theil/Gerruder
Toolkraft

The last active manufacturer of new files for die filers I am aware of was Federal File Co in Memphis Tennessee.   They are still very much in business but I think the die files have been discontinued.  I've been unable to contact them today to confirm.
Cheers,
GWRdriver
Nashville TN

Offline Dean W

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
  • My kingdom for a lathe!
    • Projects web pages
Re: filing machine
« Reply #26 on: January 26, 2011, 11:22:49 PM »
Jack, seeing your original post makes me want one (again).  That happens every time someone shows theirs!  : )
I like the MLA model.  It looks sturdy, and mainly, not too large.  My shop space is very limited. 
Thanks for the thread to get me thinking about this again.   Saw the one in John's thread a few days back, and
now this one..  Must be a sign!

Pete, I wonder how you determined your die filer is meant to cut on the up-stroke?   A great reason for them to
cut going down is that it pulls the work against the table. 
Dean W.

Shop Projects:
http://www.deansphotographica.com/machining/projects/projects.html

Praise the Lord and pass the Carbide!

Offline Bogstandard

  • Bogs Group
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: filing machine
« Reply #27 on: January 27, 2011, 02:08:51 AM »
Pete,

Many thanks for the info PDF.

As can be seen from the cover on mine, it says it is British made, but most probably made under licence from the original producer.



I need to have a closer look at the data plate.


Dean,

I had been looking for one for a few years at the right price, knowing that at some time, I would really need one to allow me to carry on in the shop.
When I least expected it, Stew donated this one to my shop. About a hundred bucks for all the correct files that I needed, and I was up and running.

There have been plans shown for ones that are driven from your lathe, but personally, I think that would be a bit of a bind to use, and I personally would always look for a stand alone unit.

Your time will come, when you least expect it.

John
If you don't try it, you will never know if you can do it.

Location - Crewe, Cheshire

Skype - bandit175

Offline GWRdriver

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 19
Re: filing machine
« Reply #28 on: January 27, 2011, 08:11:43 AM »
I've used it well for more than ten years, never got to cleaning it up after testing it, so it didn't get paint
Jack,
I can identify with that.  My die filer needed a rebuild and spiffing up when I got it, but instead it was put right to work and still needs the rebuild and paint.  When that old board thread "What's your most-used workshop tool?" invariably pops up my answer is always my FILES, but running neck & neck with them for second might be my die filer.
Cheers,
GWRdriver
Nashville TN

Offline Dean W

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
  • My kingdom for a lathe!
    • Projects web pages
Re: filing machine
« Reply #29 on: January 27, 2011, 10:26:23 PM »
John, I've seen the type for use on the lathe in a magazine article.  Might be nice but I think, like you say, could be a bind.
I'd surly have something setup in the lathe when I wanted to use it.
I enjoy my hand files and treat them nicely, as they do a lot of work for me.  I'll come across a die filer one day and probably
will wonder how I tackled life without it! 
Dean W.

Shop Projects:
http://www.deansphotographica.com/machining/projects/projects.html

Praise the Lord and pass the Carbide!

Offline madjackghengis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
  • big engine
Re: filing machine
« Reply #30 on: January 29, 2011, 09:04:38 AM »
Hi Pete, Mr. Fluffy, John et all, I'm glad I struck a note on this, there seems to be lots of interest in it, and good ideas.  Pete, you didn't highjack it, just drove it for a while.  Mr. Fluffy, I look at engines every day, and in truth, I think you could readily use a small engine, it needn't be larger than a four or five horse given the size bearings they have, and if you leave the piston in, with just the oil control ring to keep the filings out of the crankcase, and kept it full of oil, after removing the cam, you could bolt a file holder directly to the piston, and fix the table where the head used to be.  some sheet metal around the pillar the files go in, to keep the filings from having a direct path to the cylinder and making most fall off the side, and some felt packed in the ring grooves would be as good as what I've got in my machine keeping filings out of the crankcase.  the piston and rod assbly is already balanced better than we would probably do, and the addition of a pillar and the mass of a file would be nothing, as those engines are governed at 3600, and I don't think my die filer ever is run over about 800 rpm or maybe nine.  I'd say any vertical cylinder engine would be a good candidate, assuming you change the oil after you do the conversion.  That's a great idea, one to keep.  Now having stolen my thread back, all that information about die files is useful, I got a handful among some other tooling I got from someone, but knowing where it can be found is nice.  It sounds like everyone with a filing machine is as happy about theirs as I am with mine, I do wonder why I did without mine for so long, and was using it every day the last week.  Like John says, if you had to list what you use, it would be right up there near the top of the list. :nrocks: :headbang: mad jack

Offline madjackghengis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
  • big engine
Re: filing machine
« Reply #31 on: January 29, 2011, 09:38:33 AM »
John, I've seen the type for use on the lathe in a magazine article.  Might be nice but I think, like you say, could be a bind.
I'd surly have something setup in the lathe when I wanted to use it.
I enjoy my hand files and treat them nicely, as they do a lot of work for me.  I'll come across a die filer one day and probably
will wonder how I tackled life without it! 
Hi Dean, and all others who have considered one of those filing machines that fit on lathes, I've got a solid 1948 Logan ten in lathe, and I've removed the carriage and apron assembly several times just because some crumbs of iron, or of bronze have gotten under the flat way in the rear of the carriage, even while taking care to keep such things out, and the thought of deliberately filing crumbs down onto my lathe bed immediately took me off of even considering one of those, even though it would have been far easier and cheaper than buying and building the kit one.  I found out by accident at one point, the reason I'd lost my accuracy was some niggling little crumbs were under that back way, and now consider that as always a consideration.  I think, as per my earlier post, Mr. Fluffy has got the right idea, and the piston of a vertical engine, particularly if you found an old one that was say cast iron, is perfect for keeping the motion dead up and down, and I dare say the balance issue is far better addressed than in most machine tools since it is so blazingly critical to the higher speeds of the engine's purpose.  I wish Mr. Fluffy had posted before I built my filer, I'd be doing it out of an old Briggs and Stratton.  The first engine I ever "rebuilt" was a one and a quarter horse Briggs vertical, that came off a reel type lawnmower, and was given to me by a church friend, who got it from grandfather, took it apart, and couldn't figure out how it went back together.  It was all cast iron, was as tight as the day it was new, and rolling the exhaust valve on the bench and hitting it in the right spot with a hammer until it looked round fixed it, but as heavy as it was, and as rigid as everything about was, it would have been a perfect candidate.  I'm thinking one might be a perfect candidate for a vertical power hacksaw, or using a vertical shaft engine just to provide the reciprocating, and attaching an arm with the right angles incorporated so as to cut on the pull stroke, like the filer, against the solid base, and have a horizontal power hacksaw.  Again, all the bearings are there, oil is well designed into the structure, and you're not going to put any real load on it like it running under power, I don't think you'd need more than a 1/4 h.p. motor to run it, and the small ones are 3 and a 1/2, with most at five or more.  If you're not trying to run the engine, you can turn it on its side, with consideration for where the oil leaks out if on the breather side, keeping it up, and it will splash oil everything important.  One of those central air fan motors with three or five speeds would power it well and make for small rpm changes within the scope of rational pulley ratios in probably one pair.  I blew up that old cast iron Briggs when I was ten, when the outside magneto loosened the screws and fell into the flywheel, but it still would work fine for a filer, or a hacksaw, if I weren't forty years away from its last heave ho.  :lol:  :beer: cheers, mad jack

Offline bambuko

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
Re: filing machine
« Reply #32 on: January 29, 2011, 07:26:27 PM »
Can anybody see any reasons why one couldn't/shouldn't use vertical slotting/shaping head on a Bridgeport as a die filer in reverse?
With up to 4" stroke and between 70-420 strokes per minute, it should be a simple matter of arranging working table and some means of holding a file and Bob is your uncle?
Added advantage would be the fact that one could use standard files - pushing down on the table, instead of pulling towards the table as per die filer?
This is what I am talking about btw:
http://www.lathes.co.uk/bridgeport/img10.gif

Chris

Offline Bogstandard

  • Bogs Group
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: filing machine
« Reply #33 on: January 29, 2011, 09:52:40 PM »
Quote
Can anybody see any reasons why one couldn't/shouldn't use vertical slotting/shaping head on a Bridgeport as a die filer in reverse?

No reason at all Chris, except it could be a little bit of an overkill, and like using one driven by the lathe, it would be a bit of a chore to swing the main head around when you want to do a little quickie job on your mill.

Other than that, no problem.


Bogs
If you don't try it, you will never know if you can do it.

Location - Crewe, Cheshire

Skype - bandit175

Offline bambuko

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
Re: filing machine
« Reply #34 on: January 30, 2011, 04:33:30 AM »
Thanks Bogs and Ken,
I take your point about it being PITA and an overkill, but my workshop is very small so I am used to farting around like this just to get things done - I simply don't have space for another machine, even as small as die filer.
My Bridgeport had a shaper hanging from it's rear end since I bought it, but I haven't used it very often:


Chris

Offline bambuko

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 23
Re: filing machine
« Reply #35 on: January 31, 2011, 05:30:49 AM »
It's original Bridgeport accessory.

Offline J Harp

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
Re: filing machine
« Reply #36 on: February 01, 2011, 07:45:13 AM »
A York automotive AC compressor looks like it would be a good start for a filer. It has various machined mounting pads for attaching parts.
Question, what would be an ideal stroke length and strokes per minute? If using an engine or compressor the stroke would be fixed, but if you were building one from scratch what would be a good stroke length to shoot for?
Jim
Jim

Offline madjackghengis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
  • big engine
Re: filing machine
« Reply #37 on: February 12, 2011, 10:13:55 AM »
Hi Jim, Chris et al, I'd have to agree with Jim, the ac compressor would work fine, as to strokes per minute and length of stroke, mine has an inch of stroke, and I'm running it at about six hundred rpm, and that seems to work well for me.  I don't think I'd increase the stroke any at all unless I had to, but if I did, I'd reduce the speed to minimize vibration and hopping around.  I've played with a couple different engines since I posted last, I've got a weedeater engine, a little two stroke, which would be fine, just needing a cover plate for the rear, a modified spark plug to provide a guide bushing for the file holder attached to the piston, and a table for the work to sit on, and I've got a five horse Briggs and Stratton which would prefer the cam be removed, but other than that, would be a similar situation, just bigger and a bit more solid to reduce vibration.  I'd leave flywheels on, and try to use the head, or cut a piece of scrap to match it, and match drill to use head bolts, just to provide something solid to put a guide bushing in, and keep most of the filings away from the piston and bore.  Chris, that shaping head would work fine, you'd just need a table to hold the work off the mill table, with a hole in the middle, for the file to go through and I'd have a sheet or skirt of some sort to collect the filings, and keep them out of ways and such.  I wish I had that vertical shaper on the back of my mill. :poke: Truth to tell, if I had access to these ideas before I bought my kit, I'd have made one out of one of the many offered devices, they all have the potential and all are cheaper than the kit price, but having made mine, I won't let it go now.  I hope this helps on this issue, they are worth their weight in top quality scrap  :lol: mad jack


Offline J Harp

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
Re: filing machine
« Reply #39 on: February 21, 2011, 08:30:45 PM »
I found this thread again today, had forgot about it. Anyway I measured the stroke on the York compressor which I've been saving for 15 years or more. The stroke is about 1.875 inches as measured with a combination square. The compressor seems to be quite ruggedly built, they were used on big trucks, so needed to be tough. I think it would make a good start for a filer if the speed was kept fairly low.

The All American model 1500 die filer looks like a nice machine, so I downloaded a PDF manual for it. The stroke on it is 1.5 inches and the speed is variable from 210 to 470 strokes per minute. Here is a link to the manual if anyone would care to look at it. Click on "copy of owners manual".

http://www.wentztech.com/metalworking/DieFiler/DieFiler.html

Jim

Jim